Gas Masks? Bird Flu Masks? 3M Face Masks? Nano Masks? What The Scientists Believe Is The Best Bird Flu Protection And Bird Flu Prevention!
A vaccine for Bird Flu is not available. A vaccine against SARS is not even available, and it’s been over two years since SARS first struck. Even if a Bird Flu vaccine is developed, it must still be produced in mass quantities and that takes months or even years. What happens if Bird Flu transmits fully to humans, and arrives in your country tomorrow?
World Governments and medical authorities recently urged pharmaceutical companies to do their utmost to discover the vaccine capable of destroying avian H5N1 virus.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved four different influenza antiviral drugs: amantadine, rimantadine, oseltamivir (Tamiflu), and zanamivir for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza. All four have activity against influenza A viruses.
However, because the virus can evolve and mutate, influenza strains can become resistant to these drugs. Therefore the above mentioned drugs may not always be effective for treating influenza. Analyses of some 2004 H5N1 viruses isolated from poultry and humans in Asia indicate that the viruses are resistant to two of the medications, amantadine and rimantadine. Still there is hope, since the constant monitoring of avian (bird flu) viruses for resistance to mentioned medications is ongoing, together with research for other medications that can fight influenza.
At the time of writing late October 2005 update there are a variety of gas masks and face masks being provided to use as bird flu masks. However do they all offer effective, high level bird flu protection? We investigate a number of options available to you now.
Emergency Filtration Nano Mask
Perhaps the ultimate bird flu protection option is the Nano Mask, a special scientific mask that uses nanotechnology filters proven to kill the deadly Bird Flu H5N1 virus. As a result of the latest nanotechnology enchanced filters, these special masks are able to effectively isolate and destroy H5N1 viral contaminants. So far, Nano Mask is believed by most experts to be the best bird flu prevention and most reliable bird flu protection available.
The first face mask in the world to use nanotechnology enhanced filter media to isolate and destroy viral and bacterial pathogens.Two-piece mask completely adjustable and reusable. The replaceable filter is disposable. Easy to insert a new filter. SHELF LIFE is 1 year without exposure to UV rays. The enhanced facial seal allows the Nano Mask to overcome the most critical failing of typical N95 masks. Adjustable for children age two and greater.
Source: Courtesy of Oregon Digital
Nano Mask features 2H Technology Plus™, a patented filter that consistently achieves high levels of performance by utilizing nanotechnology enhanced filter media to remove virus and bacteria from inhaled and exhaled breath. This Bird Flu mask is the first face mask in the world to utilize nanotechnology enhanced filter media to effectively isolate and destroy viral and bacterial contaminants. Nanoparticles enhance the intrinsic filtration efficiency of the media by acting as a destructive absorbent to kill virus and bacteria that come into contact with the filtration system.
The comfortable two-piece face mask is completely adjustable and reusable. Only the replaceable filter insert is disposable. The mask utilizes adjustable head straps to provide a personalized, secure fit and effective seal against the face.
The unique design and enhanced facial seal allows the Nano Mask to overcome the most critical failing of typical N-95 masks. An inability to effectively seal against the face and filter inhaled and exhaled breath that will typically follow the path of least resistance; around the sides of the mask.
The low profile design doesn’t interfere with eyewear. The lower fit on the nose and wide flange assures an outstanding fit. A replaceable nano-particle enhanced filter quickly and easily inserts into the reusable body of the two piece mask. Each filter is individually packaged. Compact and lightweight the Nano mask is extremely portable. Available in multiple colors the mask is easily customized.
You’ve probably heard about N95 masks, the particulate filter masks you’ve seen health workers and some construction workers wear.
N95 masks are not effective against any particulate, virus, or bacteria smaller than .3 microns, and thus a waste of money if you buy an N95 mask for the purpose of blocking H5N1 or any influenza virus.
N95 masks will give you a false sense of security if you use them against H5N1 or any virus for that matter.
But first, examine the table below showing virus sizes, so you can judge for yourself how effective the Nano Mask is. The abbreviation nm means nanometer, which is one billionth of a meter. N95 can only filter out material greater in size than .3 microns, which is equal to 300 nanometers.
Every virus you see in the table below is smaller than 300 nanometers, therefore, N95’s are useless against these viruses.
Virus (Description) / Size
- Bacteriophage (MS) / 220nm
- Hepatitis / 24nm – 30nm
- Adenovirus / 70nm HIV /
- (AIDS) / 80nm
- Cytomegalovirus / 100nm
- Orthomyxovirus / 120nm
- Coronavirus (SARS) / 80nm – 160nm
According to Nelson Laboratories of Salt Lake City, an independent testing lab of such filters, Bacteriophage MS-2 is the recognized standard testing organism for many filters. Being one of the smallest used viruses at 220nm it is able to give a higher challenge to the filter media.
Nano Mask has been tested down to 27 nanometers or .027 microns. Good enough to stop H5N1, SARS, and other viruses listed in the Virus Size Table above.
The president of Emergency Filtration, Doug Beplate, told the author that the primary reason Nano Masks are so successful in stopping viruses is their unique nanoparticle coating on each filter. Beplate said, “The nanoparticle coating joins with chlorine particles to achieve an arrest and eradication of undesirable agents.” In other words, biohazardous particulates like H5N1 are not only blocked, but destroyed, thanks to the nanoparticle coating.
A traditional filter without the nanoparticle coating, like N95, would turn into a breeding ground for a virus or bacterial agent. Thus we caution you against using any N95 mask in a pandemic or epidemic, or even to stop ordinary colds.
Of all the methods available to protect your family, such as antivirals, vaccines, herbs, etc., a Nano Mask is the least costly in terms of time and money, and probably most effective.
Since it first emerged in 1997, avian influenza has become deadlier and more resilient. It has infected 109 people and killed 59 of them. If the virus becomes capable of human-to-human transmission and retains its extraordinary potency, humanity could face a pandemic unlike any ever witnessed.
From ‘Probable Cause’
by Laurie Garrett
Nano Mask Testing
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) is the federal agency responsible for conducting research and making recommendations for preventing work-related injury and illness. Their headquarters is in Washington, DC, and their research offices and laboratories are in Cincinnati, OH, Morgantown, WV, Pittsburgh, PA, Spokane, WA and Atlanta, GA. NIOSH utilizes a staff of over 1,400 employees from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, epidemiology, medicine, hygiene, safety, psychology, engineering, statistics, and chemistry.
Nelson Laboratories provides high quality testing to manufacturers in the medical device, nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industries since 1985. They manage a 62,000 square feet FDA registered facility in Salt Lake City, UT where they maintain eightty laboratories along with a custom-built 3,000 square feet cleanroom and employ over 170 scientists and staff. Among their more than 75 degreed scientists are over 25 registered and specialist microbiologists (National Registry of Microbiologists), they currently offer more than 400 microbiological and analytical tests and are 3rd-party certified to ISO 9001 (BSI) and EN 45001/IEC/ISO 17025 standards accredited (AMTAC).
Filtration efficiency is the measurement of a filter’s capacity to remove particulates, such as bacterium and virus, from moisture or air over a specified period of time. Filtration efficiencies are determined by testing filter media, at a specified flow rate, for penetration by an aerosol with a mean particle size of 0.3 microns. The aerosol testing is commonly performed on various types of filter media to measure efficiency and the test procedure is usually structured in one of two ways; aerosol only and aerosol with viral or bacterial challenge organism.
NIOSH tests N-series against a mildly degrading aerosol sodium chloride (NaCl), and R-series and P-series filters against a highly degrading aerosol of dioctylphthalate (DOP). NIOSH does not currently test filters against any type of challenge organisms and do not offer such testing as an option. Also, NIOSH has acknowledged that their aerosol-only test is incapable of measuring the effectiveness of nanoparticle enhanced filter media.
Nelson Laboratories is able to offer both BFE and VFE testing and as a highly respected independent testing facility their results are accepted by both the U.S. Military and FDA. In addition, the BFE and VFE test procedures can be modified to include a variety of challenge organisms and are effective in evaluating nanoparticle enhanced filters.
The FDA doesn’t accept aerosol-only tests as a validation of filtration efficiency for filters incorporated into Class II medical devices or filters used in conjunction with respiratory equipment. They require satisfactory results from BFE (Bacterial Filtration Efficiency) or VFE (Viral Filtration Efficiency) as a validation of filtration efficiency. The U.S. Military also requires satisfactory results against specific viral and bacterial organisms.
This is not intended to denigrate NIOSH, for whom we have the utmost respect, but we currently utilize Nelson Laboratories for two principal reasons: 1) Nelson Laboratories are able to validate filtration efficiencies against biological contaminates. If we were concerned solely with the removal of aerosol or very large particulates the NIOSH test would acceptable, but that is not the case. We are concerned with potentially harmful pathogens that are transmitted by aerosol and want to ensure our filters are effective against viral sized particulates. Therefore, we have chosen to test to a medical standard as we make no distinction between filters intended for medical use and filters intended for personal protection. 2) Nelson Laboratories is able to accurately measure the effectiveness of various nanoparticle solutions on a wide range of specified virus and bacterium.
Why Enhanced Filters Are Important
Nano Mask prototypes containing nanoparticle enhanced filters were tested at Nelson Laboratories. The challenge organism utilized in the testing was Bacillus thuringiensis, a closely related bacterium to Bacillus anthracis, the cause of lethal anthrax disease. Bacillus anthracis is considered too dangerous to use in the type of study so Bacillus thuringiensis is used because it demonstrates similar spore forming characteristics to Bacillus anthracis and is genotypically and phenotypically very similar.
Test materials included untreated samples and samples treated with reactive nanoparticles placed on the filter surface. After twenty-four hours, the untreated test samples showed a 6507% increase in bacterial CFU (colony forming units), while samples treated with minimum of nanoparticles showed a 21.68% reduction of bacterial CFU. This preliminary testing clearly shows pathogens filtered from airflow continue to ‘live’ and reproduce on the filter, resulting in an increase of the associated risk factors. The testing also indicates that nanoparticles are effective in eradicating pathogens on the surface of the filter media. Subsequent testing of various nanoparticles solutions was conducted in conjunction with EFP’s work to develop filter media for the United States Military. The tests were funded by a Prototype Develepment /Testing / Evaluation Grant by the Center for Commercialization of Advanced Technology awarded in September 2004. The testing was performed against specific pathogens which necessitated the use of Nelson Laboratories in order to validate results.
Under NIOSH criteria, the filter materials for respirators are tested at a flow rate of 85 L/minute for penetration by particles with median diameter of approximately 0.3 um. Three categories of filter (N, R, and P) are designated, each with three levels of filter efficiency (95%, 99%, 99.97%) for a total of nine respirator classes. The three levels of filter efficiency consist of Type 100 (99.97% efficient), Type 99 (99% efficient), and type 95 (95% efficient). The classes of these particulates respirators certified under this classification are described in 42 CFR Part 84 Subpart K. N-series filters are tested against a mildly degrading aerosol of sodium chloride (NaCl). R-series and P-series filters are tested against a highly degrading aerosol of dioctylphthalate (DOP). Type 95, Type 99 and Type 100 respirators are approved for use against particulates by NIOSH and accepted by OSHA for appropriate use in every work environment.
Nelson Laboratories Protocols
Viral Filtration Efficiency (VFE) and Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE) tests are commonly performed on various types of filter media designed to provide protection against biological aerosols. The VFE and BFE test procedures were designed after Military Specification 36954C. The aerosol challenge mean particle size [MPS] is tightly controlled and challenge aerosol particles are sized using a six-stage viable particle Andersen sampler permitting stage by stage analysis. The aerosol is then directed into a glass aerosol chamber and drawn through the filtration media and into a six-stage Anderson sampler for quantitation. The flow rate of the aerosol is maintained at 1 CFM (cubic feet per minute) or 28.3 LPM (liters per minute). The number of viral or bacterial aerosol droplets contacting the filter media is determined by conducting tests without filter medium in the test system. These challenge control are maintained between 1700-2700 CFU (colony forming units) or PFU (plaque forming units).
The Bacterial Filtration Efficiency test is conducted using Staphylococcus aureus as the challenge organism. S. aureus organisms are gram positive cocci (spherical) with approximate diameters of 0.8 microns. The VFE test is conducted using Bacteriophage OX174 as the challenge organism. Bacteriophage range in size from 0.025 to 0.027 microns. Liquid suspensions of S. aureus and Bacteriophage pump into a “Chicago” nebulizer, which disperses the suspension into small aerosol droplets. The dispersion is polydispersed. The test pressure and challenge flow rate in the nebulizer are consistently maintained to provide an aerosol with a mean particle size of 3 um.
Nano Mask: Time Kill Study
The testing of various nanoparticles was conducted at Nelson Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, in conjunction with EFP’s work to develop enhanced filter media for the United States Military. This testing was funded by a Prototype Development / Testing / Evaluation Grant by the Center for Commercialization of Advanced Technology awarded in September 2004. Various nanoparticle solutions were tested against 5 pathogens or contaminants: 1) Staphylococcus aureous, a bacteria recognized as the most common cause of hospital infections; 2) K. pneumonia, a bacteria most commonly recognized as an infection in the lungs; 3) Bacillus subtilis, a bacteria found in soil that contains similar characteristics to Anthrax; 4) Asperfillus niger, a fungus causing black mold spores and a common food contaminate; and 5) Trichophyton mentagrophyte, a fungi acting like a parasite.
Those pathogens were subjected to 6 different nanoparticles in a test known as a “Kill Time Study”, measuring the percentage reduction in pathogens at various time intervals. During the tests, the nanoparticles were mixed into a solution and introduced into a controlled environment where the pathogens had been cultured. Although all of the nanoparticles showed significant effectiveness against one or more pathogens, one nanoparticle (NPS-1) in particular demonstrated exceptional percentage reduction (Kill Rates) against all 5 pathogens.
Gas Masks: Respirator Gas Masks are used for serious air purifying applications such as for medical and scientific purposes. Do they help protect you against bird flu? Some experts are recommending the 3M 8293 P100 Face Masks. The design of the 3M #8293 face mask is for maximum efficiency. Ideal for those who want NIOSH’s highest rated filtration efficiency in a maintenance free respirator. This mask is designed for maximum HEPA filter efficiency in a maintenance-free design. This mask features a comfortable faceseal, adjustable straps, and lightweight construction.
Filters out all particles up to .3 microns thick. Cool Flow Exhalation Valve reduces moisture and heat build-up within the face piece. This mask features a comfortable faceseal, adjustable straps, and lightweight construction. Dispose of mask after 150 hours of use. One size fits all.
Expert Bird Flu Protection – 5 Important Action Steps You Can Take Now:
- Order your supply of Bird Flu Masks. Your first line of defense against Bird Flu, SARS, and Influenza should be a good quality mask such as the types described here.
- Learn natural alternative common cold and influenza treatment / flu remedy. Based on 124 years of proven scientific virus, vaccine and biophysical research and experiments from USA, UK, Japan and Denmark – leading laboratories and medical hospitals. This is probably the ultimate home remedy for cold and flu
- Strengthen your immune system to protect against virus infection. Start your bird flu survival plan and procedure now – research and start buying the following:
An infection caused by Influenza viruses leads to fever, coughs and an overall weakness of the immune system. The body struggles to fight the virus off. People with a weak immune system such as the elderly or people with chronic diseases face a higher risk of having severe problems when catching the influenza. Sometimes an influenza can even be fatal.
- Strong nutrition, healthy eating and clean, sanitary hygiene procedures are vital in your safe preparation against the bird flu – avian influenza.
There is no doubt there will be another pandemic…The number of people affected will go beyond billions because between 25 percent and 30 percent will fall ill…Pandemics occur when a completely new flu strain emerges for which humans have no immunity…An influenza pandemic will spare nobody. Every country will be affected…
Klaus Stohr, World Health Organisation WHO Global Influenza Program, Source CNN
We sincerely believe that your first action to secure effective bird flu protection and bird flu prevention is to obtain a quantity of Nano Masks – proven by exhaustive scientific testing to be the finest and most reliable bird flu masks.
Don’t you think it’s time to protect you and your family from bird flu (avian influenza) before it’s too late? Choose the best, proven bird flu masks / face masks and order today while stocks last.